Fools Abound, but the Lasso Work is the Most Impressive Part
By Lauren Yarger
Sam Shepard’s Fool for Love is another one of those revivals that has me scratching my head. With all the really great material out there, both new works and plays that deserve a Broadway revival, I have to question why plays like this one get the nod.
By Lauren Yarger
Sam Shepard’s Fool for Love is another one of those revivals that has me scratching my head. With all the really great material out there, both new works and plays that deserve a Broadway revival, I have to question why plays like this one get the nod.
This Manhattan
Theatre Club production, which was staged last year at the Williamstown Theatre
Festival, is dark with unlikable characters in a dark setting (a seedy Mohave
Desert motel designed Dane
Laffrey) and even when their dark circumstances are revealed, we’re too
depressed to feel a lot of sympathy. Did you get the dark theme? It’s the kind of depressing story that the
Pulitzer Prize committee likes: the play was a finalist when it premiered in
1983.
But for me, there
just isn’t much in the story with which I can relate. Director Daniel Aukin
casts two charismatic stars – Nina Arianda (who brought to life Venus in Fur) and Sam Rockwell (A Behanding in Spokane, The Way Way Back), but despite good performances and some really
nifty lasso work by Rockwell -- that for me, was the most interesting part of
the play (thank you Movement and Fights Director David S. Leong) -- there isn’t enough to work
with here to make this 75-minute, one-act play exciting.
Eddie (Rockwell) and May (Arianda) are lovers
reunited at the motel. They have a lot of history, ostensibly connected with “The
Old Man” (Gordon Joseph Weiss) who is
seated just outside the motel room door and who adds some details to their
story from time to time, including the information that he apparently is
married to Barbara Mandrell (what that has to with anything? Your guess is as
good as mine).
Movie stuntman Eddie has driven for days to find
May to convince her to leave her current love interest, Martin (Tom Pelphrey), and come live with him in a trailer on some
land in Wyoming (I kind of could relate when she doesn’t jump at that thrilling
offer, but that was about it….) Eddy is almost abusive at her rejection, about
the fact that she is seeing someone else and at her reluctance to begin their
relationship cycle again. Somehow they can’t seem to stay away from each other,
even though they know it would be best.
Naïve Martin seems like he probably isn’t worth
getting into a relationship with either, especially when the Old Man reveals
some startling information about the former lovers (OK, this is where the ‘fool”
part comes in, because if anyone I were dating dropped this little bomb, I
would have run very quickly from the seedy motel room, where, you know, I
wouldn’t have gone in the first place. So not relating to any of this….)
I don’t mind dark, or even stories I can relate to
personally if there is something to be learned. Shepard apparently wants us to think
about how we can’t control who we love and issues of identity. I just think
about how we can control where spend $150 on a theater ticket.
Fool for Love plays through Dec. 13 at the Samuel J. Friedman Theatre, 261 West 47th St., NYC. Peformances are Tuesday and Wednesday 7 pm; Thursday, Friday, Saturday at 8 pm; Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday at 2 pm (check schedule changes Thanksgiving week; no matinee Dec. 9). Tickets $70- $150: foolforlovebroadway.com; (800) 432-7250.
No comments:
Post a Comment